🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.